Daily Cartoonist: Mike Peters Cartoon Reworked
Alan Gardner has a disgusting example of a cartoon reworked by a magazine in order to make it say the opposite of what its cartoonist -- in this case Mike Peters -- intended. I know that re-contextualizing material is a thing, and I am a fan of that when it is done well. This is different and it is gross and it is not fair to Mr. Peters. It's just sort of unnecessary, too -- on what planet does it serve the issue you believe in to make other people who don't support it look like they're supporting it?
