I am amused that the story as linked to here has to come with not one but two qualifications, with the truth as yet unknown. "Man with job disagrees with us; potentially distasteful in doing so" isn't the media assault a new cartoon endorsed by a newspaper in the same city as a convention could have been. "Man uses rerun to make point known" is hardly any better. I can be a terrible newsperson, and make mistakes every day, but the idea that someone working in this particular area of news went off half-cocked and angry for no particular reason to lousy result did garner my attention. Some days it seems that journalism as theater may be the only journalism left.