Unraveling Objections To A Venezuelan Political Cartoon

I found fascinating this article by a Tihomir Gligorevic about a recent cartoon controversy in Venezuela. A cartoonist named Roberto Weil made a cartoon that could be seen as commentary on the recent death of a political figure particularly popular with younger voters. That's a fascinating question in and of itself: how much should a cartoonist or other editorial opinion-giver respect the loss felt by friends and family in any story involving someone passing away. You also have a significant amount of who quit when drama.

Where the story gets bonus points is for the intricacy of some other familiar issues brought to bear. For one, the cartoonist claims this is not so even as various supporting entities carry on as if that's slightly not believable, which is a rhetorical structure and tension that North American audiences should find familiar. For another, the immediate context of recent steps taken against the cartoonist Rayma Suprani changes how this story is going to be perceived. The idea that there's a line to be crossed is a really attractive one for critics, because it makes them sound tolerant and puts the onus on the cartoonist to show how their work -- even if they protest the assumed narrative for its creation -- somehow doesn't violate this asserted, vague set of principles.
 
posted 12:05 am PST | Permalink
 

---

 
Daily Blog Archives
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
 
Full Archives