September 27, 2012
Your Danish Cartoons Hangover Update
*
this is a pretty good summary as to what's going on right now and its basic context. Note that
Charlie Hebdo followed up last week's publication of Muhammed cartoons with a stunt of "two issues," one a "responsible" one with blank pages. No matter what you think of the issues involved, that one's pretty funny.
Here's an article on that new issue specifically;
here's a better one, I think, that includes the notion that one of the ideas behind publishing the cartoons is to make the publication of such cartoons unremarkable.
* here's a talking point that's emerging from the
Charlie Hebdo Muhammed cartoons:
provocation as a marketing strategy, that inciting people is just something that publications like this do now and this may be divorced a bit from editorial goals that are more engaged with the satirical landscape as it develop independently of those goals. That particular linked-to article gives some of the background on
Charlie Hebdo and Muhammed cartoons, which is welcome.
* as mentioned,
El Jueves publishes its own set of Muhammed cartoons.
Titanic will follow.
* another story gaining traction through the inclusion in multiple pieces is
an Egyptian paper's decision to fight cartoons with cartoons.
*
Charles Lane at the Washington Post says hooray for Charlie Hebdo.
*
this editorial about "pyromaniac journalism" is getting a lot of play, ironically in part because of the same sort of sensationalism -- that name! -- the piece criticizes.
* Jonah Birch
criticizes efforts to control/squash protests against the publication of those cartoons.
* and let the super-strident political commentary riffing off of these events
begin. They probably never ended, I just haven't been paying attention.
* the wonderfully-named Theodore Dalrymple
dissects statements from Hassen Chalghoumi. I always like those pieces where you're curious how they were typed when the writer is crossing his arms and harrumphing the whole time.
*
here you see some more basic themes of coverage given voice, some of which are repeated elsewhere, primarily 1) criticism that protests were spiked, 2) bringing in the semi-nude photos of what's-her-face the royal person for comparison's sake.
posted 9:00 am PST |
Permalink
Daily Blog Archives
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
Full Archives